Intensive Home Care for COVID-19 to Reduce Admissions

Hospitalization for COVID-19 has placed a significant financial and logistical burden on hospitals and health care systems. Limitations on visitation and isolation precautions have made hospitalization more isolating for patients in the time of COVID-19. Increasing the provision of healthcare delivered at home has the potential to decrease healthcare costs by providing care at home which may be preferred for many patients. We describe a series of 39 patients who were treated with intravenous remdesivir at home in addition to oxygen, dexamethasone, and anticoagulants. These patients were at high risk for decompensation due to COVID-19 and met accepted criteria for admission—need for supplemental oxygen and intravenous remdesivir. All patients had home lab monitoring and frequent telehealth visits. Over the study period 13 (33%) of patients were admitted for worsening COVID-19 and 5 (13%) died. Twenty-six patients avoided admission, and none experienced a severe adverse effect from in-home treatment. The expanded use of telehealth services due to the COVID-19 pandemic has the potential to increase the frequency of patient monitoring by physicians and the provision of care and monitoring usually restricted to hospitalized patients.

Intensive Home Care for COVID-19 to Reduce Admissions

Hospitalization for COVID-19 has placed a significant financial and logistical burden on hospitals and health care systems. Limitations on visitation and isolation precautions have made hospitalization more isolating for patients in the time of COVID-19. Increasing the provision of healthcare delivered at home has the potential to decrease healthcare costs by providing care at home which may be preferred for many patients. We describe a series of 39 patients who were treated with intravenous remdesivir at home in addition to oxygen, dexamethasone, and anticoagulants. These patients were at high risk for decompensation due to COVID-19 and met accepted criteria for admission—need for supplemental oxygen and intravenous remdesivir. All patients had home lab monitoring and frequent telehealth visits. Over the study period 13 (33%) of patients were admitted for worsening COVID-19 and 5 (13%) died. Twenty-six patients avoided admission, and none experienced a severe adverse effect from in-home treatment. The expanded use of telehealth services due to the COVID-19 pandemic has the potential to increase the frequency of patient monitoring by physicians and the provision of care and monitoring usually restricted to hospitalized patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Home Health Care Management & Practice is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Digital Health Technology and Telemedicine-Based Hospital and Home Programs in Pulmonary Medicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused a significant strain on medical resources throughout the world. A major shift to telemedicine and mobile health technologies has now taken on an immediate urgency. Newly developed devices designed for home use have facilitated remote monitoring of various physiologic parameters relevant to pulmonary diseases. These devices have also enabled home-based pulmonary rehabilitation programs. In addition, telemedicine and home care services have been leveraged to rapidly develop acute care hospital-at-home programs for the treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 illness. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: The benefit of remote monitoring technologies on patient outcomes has not been established in robust trials. Furthermore, the use of these devices, which can increase the burden of care, has not been integrated into current clinical workflows and electronic medical records. Finally, reimbursement for these telemedicine and remote monitoring services is variable. DATA SOURCES: Literature review. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES: Advances in digital technology have improved remote monitoring of physiologic parameters relevant to pulmonary medicine. In addition, telemedicine services for the provision of pulmonary rehabilitation and novel hospital-at-home programs have been developed. These new home-based programs have been adapted for COVID-19 and may also be relevant for the management of acute and chronic pulmonary diseases after the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Digital remote monitoring of physiologic parameters relevant to pulmonary medicine and novel hospital-at-home programs are feasible and may improve care for patients with acute and chronic respiratory-related disorders.

“Ambulatory Management of Moderate to High Risk COVID-19 Patients: The Coronavirus Related Outpatient Work Navigators (CROWN) Protocol”

During the height of the novel 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in New York City, area hospitals were filled to 150% capacity, and there was a significant fear among the public of going to the hospital. Many hospitalized patients were treated with therapies that could be administered in a home setting under proper monitoring. We designed the CROWN Program, a Home-Care based ambulatory protocol to evaluate, monitor, and treat moderate to high risk COVID-19 patients in their homes, with escalation to hospital care when necessary. Patients were evaluated with telehealth visits with a Pulmonologist, and a Home-Care protocol, including RN visit, pulse-oximetry, and oxygen, lab-work, intravenous fluids, medication if needed patient data, comorbidities, and symptoms were collected. Labs, including COVID-19 PCR, D Dimer, CRP, Ferritin, Procalcitonin, CBC, and metabolic panel were measured, as were homecare, home oxygen, and intravenous fluids orders, radiographic studies and initiation of an anticoagulant. Emergency Department visits and need for hospital admission during the study period were recorded. A total of 182 patients were enrolled between the start date of April 27th and June 1st, and fell into two categories: not-admitted (101) and post-discharge (81). Two patients were referred for hospital admission, seven were treated and released from the ED, and one was referred to home hospice. There were no unexpected admissions or deaths. The CROWN program has demonstrated the feasibility and apparent safety of a specialized, Home-Care based protocol for the ambulatory management of moderate to high risk COVID-19 patients.